| What happened | For example | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Damage or an impact | A forklift striking racking, a MEWP boom hitting a structure, lift doors forced or vandalised, a sling cut or crushed | Keep it out of use and have it examined |
| An overload or a dropped load | A load over the safe working load, a snatch or shock load, a load falling | Keep it out of use and have it examined |
| A failure in service | A lift's safety gear operating or its car striking the buffers, a hydraulic hose bursting, a brake not holding | Keep it out of use; have it repaired, then examined |
| Collapse, overturning or a load-bearing part failing | A crane or MEWP overturning, a rope or chain breaking on a lift or hoist | Report it under RIDDOR, and have it examined before use |
| Water, fire or conditions it was not built for | Water in a lift pit or machine room, fire or smoke damage, chemical exposure, wind above the maker's limit | Keep it out of use and have it examined |
| A long spell out of use | A lift in a building that has stood empty, plant back from storage | Have it examined before it goes back into service |
| New critical parts fitted | New ropes, chains or forks, or a new brake, fitted during a service or repair | Have it examined before use |
| A major modification or a change of use | A lift modernised, a forklift fitted with a working platform | Have it examined, and check whether its interval changes |
| Servicing, or a repair that fits no critical part | Lubrication and cleaning, or a new part with no load-bearing or safety role | No examination for that alone; keep a record of the work |
What does LOLER mean by exceptional circumstances?
Anything liable to jeopardise the safety of the equipment. On top of the six- and twelve-monthly examinations, Regulation 9 requires a thorough examination each time exceptional circumstances of that kind have occurred. The regulations give no list. HSE's examples are damage or failure, long periods out of use, and major changes likely to affect the equipment's integrity, such as modifications or the replacement or repair of critical parts, and it adds an accident or dangerous occurrence and a significant change in the conditions of use. Whether anyone was hurt makes no difference. The question is whether the equipment could have been made unsafe.
Who decides whether it needs examining?
You do, as the duty-holder: the employer, or whoever controls the equipment. Between visits the examiner only knows what you tell them, and the next periodic visit may be months away. The people who see these events are the operators, the site team and the maintenance company, so make sure they report damage, overloads and failures to you instead of carrying on. If you are not sure whether something was serious enough, ask a competent person before the equipment is used again, and keep it out of use while you wait for the answer.
Can the equipment be used until the examiner arrives?
Not if what happened could have made it unsafe. The examination is how you establish that it is safe to use, so until then it stays out of service: a lift taken out of service with a notice at each landing; a forklift, MEWP or crane isolated, with its key removed where it has one and a tag saying why; and a damaged sling, chain or shackle set aside where nobody can pick it up, rather than returned to the store.
Does a repair mean it must be examined again?
Not every repair. HSE's guidance is that where a service or repair fits new parts that the thorough examination covers, the equipment must be thoroughly examined before it is used. Those are parts such as ropes, chains, forks or a brake. A major repair or modification likely to affect its integrity is one of the exceptional circumstances in its own right. Routine servicing, and repairs that replace none of those parts, do not call for one by themselves. Either way, keep the repairer's record of what was done: it is your evidence that a defect on the last report was put right before the equipment went back into use.
Who should examine it after a repair?
A competent person independent of the work being judged. HSE says the person who maintains equipment should not also examine it, and after a repair the reason is plain: whoever carried out the repair would be checking their own work. An examiner with no stake in the repair gives you a finding that you, your insurer and an inspector can rely on.
Does an accident have to be reported?
Possibly, under RIDDOR, and that is separate from the examination. The collapse or overturning of lifting equipment, or the failure of any load-bearing part of it, is a dangerous occurrence that must be reported even if nobody was hurt. The failure of a lifting accessory, such as a sling or shackle, is not. Injuries that meet RIDDOR's thresholds must be reported too. The report is made by the employer or the person in control of the premises, not by the examiner. If the examination then finds a defect involving an existing or imminent risk of serious personal injury, the examiner must also send a copy of the report to the enforcing authority.
What should you tell the examiner?
Everything you know about what happened, so the examination goes where the damage could be:
- What happened and when, and who saw it.
- Whether the equipment has been used since.
- Any repair, with the repairer's record and the parts replaced.
- Photographs, if anyone took them.
- The last report, so the examiner can see what has changed.
What will the report say?
Like every report of thorough examination, it must contain what Schedule 1 of LOLER sets out. It states that the examination followed exceptional circumstances, whether the equipment is safe to operate, any defect with what is needed to put it right and by when, and the latest date for the next thorough examination. Go by that date rather than assuming the six- or twelve-month cycle has restarted.
How long out of use counts as a long period?
The regulations do not put a figure on it. Equipment deteriorates standing still: hydraulic seals harden, ropes and chains corrode where they sit, and brakes can bind. A lift in a building that has stood empty, plant back from storage and a machine laid up for a season are the usual cases, and the maker's instructions for returning it to service are the place to start. If its periodic examination fell due while it was standing, it needs examining before use in any case.
Sources & Further Reading
- Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/2307), Regulations 9 and 10 (opens in a new tab)
- Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, Schedule 1 — information to be contained in a report of a thorough examination (opens in a new tab)
- HSE — Thorough examinations of lifting equipment (opens in a new tab)
- HSE — Equipment and machinery frequently asked questions (opens in a new tab)
- HSE L113 — Safe use of lifting equipment (ACOP and guidance) (opens in a new tab)
- Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/1471), Schedule 2 (opens in a new tab)
- HSE — RIDDOR: dangerous occurrences (opens in a new tab)
- HSE — RIDDOR: who should report (opens in a new tab)
Independent inspection, same-day report with photos
We reply within one business hour, and the inspection is carried out by an engineer with hands-on experience of that kind of plant.